Audience & Genre

When I originally sat down to begin brainstorming for my research essay, “The Future Superpowers of the 21st Century”, I realized I would need to put a twist on my topic that authors before me had not yet successfully done. My topic was quite complex, even for those somewhat familiar with economics, and considering the fact that I would be writing this for my 18/19 year-old peers, I realized I would somehow have to simplify the issue without leaving out the main points. I did not only want to do this to better convey my message, but I hoped the twist would also make my paper more interesting to read.

Throughout my essay, which discusses the rising power of China and India and the impact they may have on American society, I would come across very confusing and dull topics that bored even me to read. I tried to approach these topics in the same way my economics professor did when he taught them to me—very, very slowly. I removed the complex jargon of my sources, most of whom were economic and political scholars, and tried to convey the main idea in the most basic of terms. I viewed my research paper not as a persuasive paper by any means, but rather a very clear and detailed explanatory essay. My reason for approaching the assignment this way was not because there is nothing to persuade, but I felt I could write a better essay if I wasn’t trying to focus on my ‘sales pitch’ the entire time. I decided to let my research do the persuasion for me, and I think that worked in the final product. In my opinion, people—especially those my own age—hate being told what to do or think. Often times, they will disagree just for the sake of individuality. I hoped to avoid this and merely express the facts. To do this, I would allow experts to tell my information for me. Almost every time I had an important fact that I wished to convey, I would quote an expert as saying it. I find that will often turn out to be much more successful than an opinion from an 18 year old college freshman. For this same reason, I wrote this paper in a much formal manner. If the audience didn’t know who I was, or what I was writing this for, they would never know that I have virtually no credibility on the topic.

I kept my research paper as objective as possible by avoiding the use of personal pronouns and unfounded opinions or biases. This approach is significantly different than one I would use to write an in-class assignment or personal piece of writing, as I often use my own opinions to express feelings I have on the topic, or simply release emotions inside myself. I find that my writing can only be extremely personal, or entirely objective. I cannot write an opinionated essay without getting into it, and expressing my opinions in a way that everyone will know how strongly I feel. However, because I am such an outspoken individual, it is often difficult for me to write objectively. To overcome that challenge, I often resort to the opinions of external credible sources and unbiased facts. Due to the fact that these topics sometimes conflict with my opinions, I try to distance my personality as much as possible from the piece.

I hold a firm belief that without expressing one’s emotions in a piece of writing, that piece is merely words on a piece of paper, whereas expressional writing is an art form where you can truly feel the passion of the author. I do believe objective writing is essential in society, as it lets us see things for what they truly are, but I do not think it builds any character of the individual writing it.